The EF 70-200mm f/4.0 USM L has a $40 rebate right now (539.99), making it slightly cheaper than the EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM (564.99). I will be using either lens as a Telephoto Zoom along with EF 28-135mm IS USM, EF 35-105mm f/3.5-4.5 Macro and EF 22-55mm f/4.5-5.6 USM (which I plan to sell since I have grown out of it). I then plan to buy decent standard and possibly large telephoto prime lenses to accompany my system. I am purchasing a Canon 40D (realize the 1.6X magnification) and already own an Elan 7E. I am a Graduate student/amateur photographer. I sometimes photograph weddings, but mostly abstract photography is my game. I usually cannot afford L series lenses, but this seems like the time to do so. The 70-300mm would give me a larger telephoto range + IS. The L Series has slightly better performance in all areas it seems, no IS but I have a decent tripod anyways + experience with said tripod. Should I go for the L Series lens and why? Renting would be nice but I'm living in the boonies.
1. Get Paid To Submit Photos Online
2. Learn Digital Photography Now
3. Digital Photography Secrets